Using financial theory to explain Open Source

This article on ONLamp uses financial theory to examine the difference between Open Source and proprietary software, concluding that:

Therefore, the major difference in worldview between open source advocates and proprietary software license advocates is explainable as a differing opinion on the correct value of the volatility of maintenance and upgrade pricing. People who believe that the pricing on maintenance is stable and unlikely to change see greater intrinsic value in the software. People who fear that the pricing is subject to large fluctuations see no intrinsic value in the up-front license; stripped of the options, the license value approaches $0.

For the open source movement, perhaps a better way to position the change that OSS is making is this: we’re converting warrants on future maintenance and enhancements into options, which means that instead of having a sole supplier (warrants), we have created a third-party market (options) of these derivatives.

What an interesting way to look at things…. and very powerful. What happens to Enterprise Software when purchasing departments begin to do these calculations?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *